The Manhattan Plaza residents gathered last Tuesday to discuss a proposed casino in Times Square. The plan, put forth by Roc Nation and SL Green, faced criticism from various groups, including Broadway workers and Manhattan Plaza tenants. The bid could be in jeopardy due to the backlash it has received.
Tenant Association President Aleta LaFargue, who previously opposed the plan, took a softer stance at the meeting. However, it was later revealed that she had been offered a $20,000 monthly contract by Roc Nation to work as an independent contractor. LaFargue initially denied signing any contracts but later admitted to being offered consulting work.
The residents of Manhattan Plaza play a crucial role in determining the fate of the proposed casino, as community support is a key factor in the decision-making process. Each proposal must submit a significant table stake and commit to high tax rates to be considered.
While SL Green has disclosed lobbying spending, Roc Nation reported minimal expenses. This has raised concerns about the tactics being used to gain community support. State regulators are monitoring the situation closely.
Despite the controversy surrounding the proposed casino, Roc Nation representatives presented plans for security, sanitation, and community programs at the meeting. They also pledged substantial funding for the Manhattan Plaza Tenants Association.
As the debate continues, LaFargue’s involvement with Roc Nation remains a point of contention. The residents of Manhattan Plaza will need to carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of the proposed casino before making a decision.
Overall, the future of the Times Square casino project remains uncertain as community stakeholders, including Manhattan Plaza residents, weigh in on the issue. The decision will have far-reaching implications for the neighborhood and its residents.
